Partial volume and spillover effects in cardiac PET studies
Analytical method
Henze et al. (1983) suggested an analytical method to correct for the spillover and recovery fractions. The method was validated by Herrero et al. (1988). The method needs the cardiac dimensions: myocardial wall thickness and cavity diameter, which may not always be available. The method also assumes 10% vascular space, which is also corrected.This correction can be applied to the regional data before modeling, for example by using heartcor.
Geometrical model
The spillover and partial volume effects are taken into account in compartment models by assuming a geometrical model (Hutchins et al., 1990) and based on thatCPET(t) = FLV×CLV(t) + (1-FLV)×CMYO(t)
, where CPET(t) is the measured myocardial PET concentration as a function of time, CLV(t) is the measured concentration in the middle of left ventricular cavity, representing also true arterial concentration, and (1-FLV) is
regional recovery coefficient (between 0 and 1). This method is easy to implement, but it ignores the partial volume effect on the outer side of myocardial wall (Hutchins et al., 1992).
Model for [15O]H2O
Iida et al. (1991, 1992) proposed a model for quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with [15O]H2O and PET, where the recovery coefficients in both myocardial and LV regions and the spillover fractions from blood to myocardium and from myocardium to blood were included in the model parameters.This model can be applied to the regional data by using fitmbf.
Further reading
For a short review on general methods to account for spillover and partial volume effects, see for example Feng et al. (1996).