Models for simulation of regional PET TTACs
Software for simulation
PET tissue time-activity curves (TTACs) can be simulated based on the input function, compartmental model, and model parameters, using the software listed below:
Compartmental models with plasma input
- 3-tissue compartment model: sim_3tcm for simulating
optionally more than one TTACs at the same time, with parameters in a text file;
or p2t_3c and p2t_v3c for simulating one TTAC with parameters on command-line. - 4-tissue compartment model with dual-input and/or kLoss
Models with 1- or 2-tissue compartments can be simulated simply by setting the rate constants that apply to the second or third compartment to zero.
For demonstration purposes Excel worksheets are available for the simulation of
These programs and worksheets use the direct ODE solutions for discrete-time data. There really is no reason to use the convolution method for simulations, but programs and convexpf are available for that purpose.
2-tissue compartment model with reference tissue input
Program sim_rtcm can be used to simulate TTACs using the following reference tissue input models:
- Full reference tissue model
- Simplified reference tissue model
- Reduced reference tissue model (k4=0)
- Transport limited reference tissue model
Dedicated models for PET tracers or targets
- [15O]H2O in myocardium
- [15O]H2O in liver
- General [15O]H2O model: b2t_h2o or sim_h2o
- [15O]O2 in skeletal muscle
- [18F]FDOPA (outdated)
- [18F]FETNIM (outdated)
Shape analysis
Program simshape can be used to simulate regional TTAC using shape analysis method.
See also:
- Parameters for simulation
- Input for simulations
- Adding noise to simulated data
- Compartmental models
- Analysis of regional TAC data
Literature
Chen K, Huang S, Feng D. New estimation methods that directly use the time accumulated counts in the input function in quantitative dynamic PET studies. Phys Med Biol. 1994; 39: 2073-2090. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/39/11/017.
Coxson PG, Salmeron EM, Huesman RH, Mazoyer BM. Simulation of compartmental models for kinetic data from a positron emission tomograph. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. 1992; 37: 205-214. doi: 10.1016/0169-2607(92)90116-O.
Coxson PG, Huesman RH, Borland L. Consequences of using a simplified kinetic model for dynamic PET data. J Nucl Med. 1997; 38: 660-667. PMID: 9098221.
Huang S, Bahn MM, Phelps ME. A new technique for solving nonlinear differential equations encountered in modeling of neuroreceptor-binding ligands. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1988; 35(1): 762-766. doi: 10.1109/23.12828.
Kuwabara H, Cumming P, Reith J, Léger G, Diksic M, Evans AC, Gjedde A. Human striatal L-DOPA decarboxylase activity estimated in vivo using 6[18F]fluoro-DOPA and positron emission tomography: error analysis and application to normal subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993; 13: 43-56. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1993.7.
Tags: Simulation, TAC, Modeling, Excel, Compartmental model, Rate constant, Parameters, 1TCM, 2TCM, 3TCM
Updated at: 2019-10-25
Created at: 2010-09-20
Written by: Vesa Oikonen